CLICK ON THIS LINK TO GET A SIMILAR PAPER ON; ESSAYSHARKS.US
ASSESSMENT TASK 3: Social
Action Plan – Group
Report and Presentation/video
|
Assessment task
3a
|
Social
Action Plan-
Group Report
|
|
Due date/
Assignment
submission
|
Week 11
Submit your assignment BOTH
- Electronically via Moodle, AND
- Hard copy in
tutorial class
- EMAIL
SUBMISSIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
|
|
Word limit
|
2000 words (+/- 10%), plus references (Students are required to use the LTU Harvard
Referencing style)
|
|
Type of assignment
|
Group assessment
|
|
Weighting
|
40% of the total marks for this subject
10%
Critical thinking and problem solving as a
team
10%
Writing
10% Personal reflection
5% collaboration and participation
5% Location, selection and use of information
|
|
Grading criteria:
|
Assessment specific grading criteria
in the Subject Learning Guide
|
|
Important notes
|
- Signed Assignment Cover Sheet (Academic Integrity
Student Declaration form) must be attached to hard copy submission
- For electronic submissions: ONLY Microsoft Office document types are accepted
- Font size not smaller than Times New Roman 12
- You MUST keep a
duplicate copy of your assignment
|
|
Assessment task
3b
|
Social
Action Presentation or Campaign Video
|
|
Due date/
Assignment submission
|
Week 12 classes. Each group will present their social action plan to the rest of the class.
Format: Live presentation or video campaign
Time: 12 mins (2mins per student, 5 students per group including questions)
|
|
Type of assignment
|
Group Presentation (Individual Presentation mark)
|
|
Weighting
|
10%
of the total marks for this subject
|
|
Grading criteria:
|
Assignment specific grading criteria
in the Subject Learning Guide
|
Intended
learning outcomes:
|
3
|
Demonstrate and justify the
use of management skills to solve a
contemporary social
problem in a dynamic environment.
|
|
4
|
Communicate effectively through professional oral
presentations.
|
|
5
|
Communicate effectively through structured written argument in a
professional report format.
|
|
6
|
Search for,
locate and evaluate discipline specific
information.
|
|
7
|
Demonstrate and reflect on personal views and have an openness
to the perspective of others.
|
Purpose
and aims:
CLICK ON THIS LINK TO GET A SIMILAR PAPER ON; ESSAYSHARKS.US
The purpose of this assessment is to enable and actively engage students to lead their own action. Along with applying the knowledge and skills gained from learning about local, national and global issues, students will
be supported in the development of
the
necessary skills of
problem/opportunity identification and action planning, necessary to be
pro-active in making a positive difference in the world. This is also designed to provide an opportunity for students to work collaboratively and respectfully with a range of students from diverse backgrounds.
Each class will collaborate together to define ONE socially-based problem or opportunity which could be a local, national or
global issue/opportunity relevant to some
aspect of diversity, equity, social inclusion and engagement, which requires a proposal for a solution or offers an opportunity for development that will involve an aspect of social advancement.
As a small group**, you must be able to define the scope of the issue/opportunity through inquiry/research, critically analyse the issue and arguments regarding the nature/importance of the issue; and offer solutions to the issue or a means of realising the opportunity.
** This assessment requires students to actively engage and work collaboratively with a diverse range of students
to be able to understand the perspectives
of
others; therefore, small groups of 5 (groups will be formed in week 2) will be formed by self- selection (with the support of the lecturer) however, you are highly recommended to have a range of disciplines, ages, cultural
and
linguistic skills as the greater the diversity of your group, the broader the range of ideas that will be available to you. This assessment task provides students an opportunity for inter-cultural learning, which requires a culturally heterogeneous
mix
of students.
Description
of the assessment:
There are TWO parts to the assessment:
Part A: Group action plan on a social issue/opportunity: a written report comprising of
2000 words. (40%)
Part B: Presentation or Campaign Video (10%) In week 12 classes, each group will present the social action plan to the class. Each
member of the group will
receive an individual mark based on the presentation. Each
group must present for 12 minutes in
total, including questions.
Students are required at least 4 types of resources in the group social action plan:
1. Minimum of 2 journal articles (students are required to use scholarly and peer-reviewed articles)
2. Newspaper articles
3. Prescribed textbook
4. Website
Steps in
developing the class issue/opportunity:
|
Week
|
Action required
|
Outcome
|
|
4
|
The lecturer introduces Assessment task 3: the purpose and
requirements of the assessment.
In this session, each student in the class is asked to think about
ONE issue/opportunity that they would like to pursue or write
about. (students are encouraged look at newspapers, magazines, news reports etc)
|
One issue/opportunity from each student to be
provided by
week 5
|
|
5
|
Anonymously, each student to write
down the
issue/opportunity on a post-it note and place on the whiteboard
|
Class to discuss the issues/opportunities
presented and identify themes emerging (4 or 5
themes to be identified)
|
|
6
|
Each group is to brainstorm using butcher paper each of
themes that was identified in week 4 and decide on which
issue/opportunity they would like to
work on.
Groups to
vote on ONE issue/opportunity by nominating their preferred issue and placing it
in the box provided. Lecturer to count the votes.
|
Lecturer to gather all the suggested
issues/opportunities themes and each class is to
vote ONE issue/opportunity
|
Examples of Social
Issues, problems or opportunities to be addressed in the Social Action Plan
1. Cultural Diversity
2. Gender
3. Indigenous Issues
4.
Euthanasia
5. Cyber-Bullying
6. Obesity
7. Self-image
- Global warming
- Globalisation
- Drug abuse
- Homelessness
- Genetic engendering
- Child labour
- Animal rights
Template for
Social Action
Plan
Part A – Written Report
Part A of the Social Action plan needs to include the following:
1. Background to
the
Issue
This includes, but is not limited to a description of
the
issue, why it is important, whom it affects, and the costs to society of
inaction. This section should also include a description of the company/group that has been chosen to address the issue.
2. Objectives of the Action Plan
In this section, groups should outline the key objectives of the action plan. In doing so, students should demonstrate
awareness of the viability and practicality of the objectives involved, and the availability of resources to meet the said
objectives.
3. Proposed Actions
Each objective should be broken down into a set of implementable action points.
4. Anticipated Outcomes
Each action point from Section 3 above is required to have a
set
of measurable anticipated outcomes associated with it.
5. Key roles and responsibilities
Given the company/group described under Section 1, the roles and reporting structure should be outlined and described
using an organisational chart. Following this, the key responsibilities, and individuals accountable for each action need to
be outlined.
6. Timelines and resources required
The anticipated completion date for each action, and the resources required to complete them are to be described in this section.
7. Key Risks
In this section, groups need to
demonstrate that they are aware of
any
potential risks and downside associated with each of the action points.
8. Evaluation Method
Here students
are
expected to describe the methods to be used to evaluate
the
progress
of each action point against the stated objectives and anticipated outcomes (Sections 2 and 4 respectively). Groups should also include when the evaluation
is going to be undertaken, assuming that the action points will have varying timelines associated with them.
9. Finally, each group is required to summarise the Social Action Plan into the following table, and attach it as an appendix to
the
report (It does not form part of the word count):
Social Action
Plan:
Group Name
Social Action plan: Team members:…………………………………………………………………….
Description of the Issue:
|
Objective 1:
|
|||||
|
Proposed
Actions
|
Anticipated
Outcomes
|
Key
Responsibilities
|
Timelines
and
Resources
Required
|
Key Risks
|
Evaluation
Method
|
|
1.
2.
3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective 2:
|
|||||
|
Proposed
Actions
|
Anticipated
Outcomes
|
Key
Responsibilities
|
Timelines
and
Resources
Required
|
Key Risks
|
Evaluation
Method
|
|
1.
2.
3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part B – Presentation
or
Campaign Video (Due date: Week
13
classes)
Groups are expected to present their respective Social Action Plan tables to the rest of the class. This needs to be done in an engaging and professional manner, and should be conducted in a PowerPoint presentation and/or Campaign video format.
Each group must present for 12 mins in total, including questions. Each member of the group will need to present for 2 mins and each student will receive an individual mark based on the presentation.
All students will be provided with peer feedback.
During presentations/videos, students will be providing feedback using the
grading rubric (provided). The feedback will be anonymous, and will be collated and provided back to each group.
Guidelines for the in class- presentation
• Groups of 5 students (some regional classes may define groups of a
different size)
• All students are required to present. Each student is responsible to speak for 2 mins
Guidelines for Campaign Video
• Each group member to present for an equal length of time (2 mins)
• The video must be
10 mins in total,
with each member of
the
group presenting. Students who present a video will also have question time in class (2 mins)
• Videos must be uploaded on desktop computer. Please make sure the video link(s)
work before class. Failure to do this may
result in deduction of marks.
|
Criteria
|
Excellent (A 80-100%)
|
Very Good (B 70-79%)
|
Good (C
60-69%)
|
Pass (D 50-59%)
|
Fail (N 0-49%)
|
Grade
|
|
Writing
|
Authoritative
use of management/business
concepts and terminology in group action plan. Clearly states the purpose, assertion, arguments and findings, and supports this with
evidence in a sustained and
logical fashion.
|
Proficient use of management/business terminology in group
action plan and orders ideas
in a structured and
sequenced fashion, aimed at making a
central argument
or assertion.
|
Competent
use of management/business
terminology in group
action plan. Contains many
relevant ideas, and attempts to structure
them in a coherent manner.
|
Limited use
of appropriate management/business
terminology in group
action plan.
Contains some relevant ideas, but is
unable to relate them in an
organised manner.
|
Contains
little or no meaningful
information relating to the task, and makes
no attempt
to produce an organised response to the task.
|
/10
|
|
Location, selection and use of information (evidence
and citation)
|
Locates, evaluates and
integrates a
range of relevant
information (or data) into the construction of a response to the task, and uses the discipline sanctioned Harvard Referencing Style
at
sources in a timely and appropriate fashion.
|
Locates and synthesises a
range of relevant information
(or data) to
inform the
response to the task, and
uses the discipline sanctioned Harvard Referencing Style
at http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/r eferencing-tool/harvard
to cite sources in a timely and
appropriate fashion.
|
Uses a range of
prescribed information sources
(or data) to inform the response
to the task,
and uses the discipline sanctioned Harvard Referencing Style
at http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/r eferencing-tool/harvard
to cite sources in a timely and
appropriate fashion, but with
some errors.
|
The
response to the
task relies
upon a narrow or partially relevant
selection of information sources (or very limited data) and uses the
discipline sanctioned Harvard
Referencing Style at http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/refer encing-tool/harvard
to cite sources in a timely and
appropriate fashion, but with some errors
|
Irrelevant sources and data selected to inform the response to the task, or used inappropriately,
with little or no attribution.
|
/5
|
|
Problem-solving
approaches/critical
thinking
|
Situates the problem
or issue presented in within a management
context or conceptual framework and
draws supported conclusions
from applying key management concepts to
provide well justified solutions.
|
Precisely identifies all relevant factors of
the management problem presented and accurately applies
management concepts to
provide a possible solution.
|
Correctly identifies many
relevant factors of the management
problem presented and
attempts, with some inaccuracy, to apply management
concepts to achieve a solution
|
Correctly identifies some relevant
factors of
the management
problem presented and
attempts with some uncertainty to apply management concepts to achieve a
feasible solution.
|
Makes little or no attempt to
separate the elements of the problem presented or to relate them to relevant management concepts.
|
/10
|
|
Collaboration and participation
|
An
integrated contribution
to the group
social action plan, which reflects
critical assimilation of group perspectives, reaching a
balanced and well founded conclusion, set of findings or
recommendations.
|
A co-ordinated
contribution
to the group
social action plan, which reflects
assimilation
of group perspectives, reaching
a qualified
conclusion, set of
findings or recommendations.
|
A response to the group social
action plan which attempts to accommodate or draw upon the group
contribution
in a coherent and
structured
fashion, reaching a tentative
conclusion, set of findings or
recommendations.
|
A response to the group social
action plan, which reflects group contribution,
and constructs a less
than coherent, but plausible,
conclusion, set of findings or
recommendations.
|
Response does not account
for group
social contributions, or is unable to effectively include
other points of view
to reach a
plausible conclusion.
|
/5
|
|
Personal
reflection
|
A very clear
understanding of
one’s own thinking and learning
processes by examining
openly own experiences and clearly articulating the
diversity
of opinions
within the
group.
|
A clear understanding of
one’s own
thinking and learning
processes by examining
openly own experiences and clearly articulating the
diversity
of opinions
within the
group.
|
An understanding of
one’s own thinking and
learning processes by examining
openly own experiences and clearly articulating the diversity
of opinions
within the
group.
|
No
clear understanding of one’s own
thinking and
learning processes by
examining openly own experiences and
clearly articulating the diversity of opinions within the group.
|
No understanding of
one’s own thinking and
learning processes by examining
openly own experiences and clearly articulating the diversity
of opinions
within the
group.
|
/10
|
|
COMMENTS /40
|
||||||
Grading Criteria
Assessment Task 3b: Group Action Plan Presentation
(10%)
|
Criteria
|
Excellent (A80-100%)
|
Very Good (B 70-79%)
|
Good (C
60-69%)
|
Pass (D 50-59%)
|
Fail (N 0-49%)
|
Grade
|
|
Presentation & Engagement
|
Persuasively defines the
conceptual approach to the presentation, structures the presentation and
uses clear, powerful
and appropriate
language for
an academic and
professional audience.
|
Coherently and logically structures the presentation
and uses clear
and appropriate
language for
an academic and
professional audience.
|
Logically structures
the presentation), approaching coherence, and
uses some appropriate language
for student
(or disciplinary) audience.
|
Attempts to structure
the presentation if somewhat incoherently, and uses minimal
appropriate language
for student
(or disciplinary) audience.
|
Makes no attempt
to structure the
presentation and does not appropriate language for
student (or disciplinary focus).
|
/3
|
|
Questions and Discussion
|
Responds to questions
in a precise, persuasive manner with relevance to the
presentation and refers to information that goes
beyond ideas already presented.
|
Responds to questions
in a precise
manner with relevance to
the presentation and refers to some information that
goes
beyond
ideas already presented.
|
Responds to questions
in an appropriate manner and
with some
relevance to the presentation, and shows knowledge and understanding of the topic
|
Responds to questions
in an appropriate and coherent manner, but demonstrates a limited knowledge of the topic
|
Does not respond
to questions
or does so with little coherence
and relevance to the topic.
|
/2
|
|
Disciplinary
Knowledge
|
Disciplinary knowledge is clearly presented and uses
disciplinary language authoritatively;
shows critical understanding of the
issue presented and demonstrates depth and accuracy of understanding.
|
Disciplinary
knowledge is
clearly presented and
uses disciplinary
language competently, shows a proficient awareness of the
issue presented and demonstrates accuracy of
understanding.
|
Disciplinary knowledge is presented and
uses disciplinary
language approaching
competency, shows an awareness
of the issue
presented and
demonstrates limited content understanding.
|
Disciplinary
knowledge lacks
clarity and uses disciplinary language tentatively,
shows an awareness
of the issue
presented and some evidence
of gaining new understanding.
|
Disciplinary knowledge is unclear and
does not use the language of the discipline
in a sustained
fashion, and demonstrates
no evidence of gaining new understanding.
|
/3
|
|
Participation
and
Collaboration
|
An
integrated contribution
to the response to the
task, which
reflects critical
assimilation
of other group perspectives, reaching a
balanced and well-founded conclusion, set of findings or
recommendations.
|
A co-ordinated
contribution
to the response to the
task, which
reflects assimilation
of other perspectives,
reaching a
qualified conclusion, set of findings or recommendations.
|
A response to the
task which attempts
to accommodate or draw
upon each individual
contribution in a coherent and
structured fashion, reaching a tentative
conclusion, set of findings or
recommendations.
|
A response
to the task, which
reflects each individual
contribution, and constructs a less than
coherent, but plausible, conclusion, set of
findings or
recommendations.
|
Response does not account
for other
contributions,
or
is
unable to effectively
include other
points of
view
to reach a
plausible conclusion.
|
/2
|
|
COMMENTS
| ||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment